Legal Opinion

Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. Allen

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided May 21, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 757PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Chief Judge.

Upon consideration of the evidence and arguments in the above stated case, heard without the intervention of a jury, the Court does hereby make the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

Findings of Fact

1

Plaintiff is now and at all times hereinafter mentioned has been a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia and having its principal office and place of business in the City of Atlanta, Georgia.

2

Marion'H. Allen, the defendant, is now .and at all times hereinafter mentioned has been Collector of Internal Revenue of: the United…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  2. Allen v. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Bijou Theatrical Enterprise Co. v. MenningerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1954
  4. Knudsen Creamery Co. of California v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  5. Allen v. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API