Atlanta Metallic Casket Co. v. Allen
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Chief Judge.
Upon consideration of the evidence and arguments in the above stated case, heard without the intervention of a jury, the Court does hereby make the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
Findings of Fact
1
Plaintiff is now and at all times hereinafter mentioned has been a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia and having its principal office and place of business in the City of Atlanta, Georgia.
2
Marion'H. Allen, the defendant, is now .and at all times hereinafter mentioned has been Collector of Internal Revenue of: the United…
2Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Allen v. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Bijou Theatrical Enterprise Co. v. MenningerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1954
- Knudsen Creamery Co. of California v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Allen v. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952