Legal Opinion

Knudsen Creamery Co. of California v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 3, 1954No. Civ. 15336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

This action for refund of documentary stamp taxes paid in accordance with §§ 1800 and 1801 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. §§ 1800, 1801, having been tried and the cause submitted for decision; and it appearing to the court from the evidence:(1) that the instruments in controversy were “typed on plain white paper and did not bear the corporate seal,” Cf. Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Fitzpatrick, 2 Cir., 213 F.2d 305, reversing D.C.D.Conn. 1953, 112 F.Supp. 132; United States v. Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co., 8 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 584, 588; Allen v. Atlanta, etc.,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Belden Mfg. Co. v. JareckiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. HofferbertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1950
  4. Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  5. United States v. Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Leslie Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Founders Inc. v. KelmDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API