Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Ten Napel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

— It is admitted that the property covered' by the appellee’s mortgage is the homestead of the appellants. The mortgage was given to secure the existing indebtedness of the husband, the notes described in the mortgage being signed by the husband and a son only, and being of earlier date than the mortgage, or in renewal of earlier like notes.

The defense presented is that the wife could not read or understand the English language, and that her signature to the mortgage was procured by fraud on the part of her husband and the president of the bank; and that, being upon the homestead, if invalid…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BelliwithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  2. Midland Mortgage Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Barnes v. Century Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Blossi v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Burns v. SpikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Indemnity Insurance v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  3. Rasmus v. AO Smith CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  4. Popejoy v. EastburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. J. B. Colt Co. v. KocherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API