Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Moatz
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 20, 2006No. 05-1144, 05-1399PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge MOTZ joined.
KING, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Richard W. Goldstein, a patent lawyer, appeals the district court’s dismissal, on mootness grounds, of his civil action against certain officials in the Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”), and the PTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline (the “OED”). He also appeals the court’s denial of his application, under the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”), for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. As explained below, we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Walker v. City of Mesquite, TXCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Smyth ex rel. Smyth v. RiveroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Goldstein v. MoatzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by21 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Great Steaks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Bradley Nigh v. Koons Buick Pontiac Gmc, Incorporated, and Household Automotive Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Mirta Morillo-Cedron v. District Director for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Ma v. Chertoff Ex Rel. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.