Legal Opinion

Alcon Laboratories, Inc. v. Pharmacia Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 2, 2002No. 01 Civ. 2989(WHP)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAULEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and Alcon Manufacturing, Ltd. (collectively “Alcon”) filed this action against defendants Pharmacia Corporation and Phar-macia & Upjohn Company (collectively “Pharmacia”) and the Trustees of Columbia University (“Columbia”), seeking a declaratory judgment that their glaucoma treatment product, marketed under the brand-name Travatan, does not infringe on U.S. Patent No. 4,599,353 (the “ ’353 patent”) and that the ’353 patent is invalid. The ’353 patent, which was issued in 1986, is owned by Columbia and exclusively…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  4. N.F.A. Corp. v. Riverview Narrow Fabrics, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  5. In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, P.L.L.C. v. Eastman Kodak CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Sea Tow International, Inc. v. PontinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Shanghai Meihao Electric, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  4. Tailored Lighting, Inc. v. Osram Sylvania Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  5. Ed Tobergte Associates Co. v. Russell Brands, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API