Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Twin City Power Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided October 16, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. On exceptions to answer.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case now comes up on exceptions to the answer for insufficiency. As these exceptions involve the practice in equity pleading, the discussion of the questions involved- therein will be more elaborate than usual. The only mode of taking advantage of defects in an answer is by written exceptions, 1 Daniell, Ch. Pl. & Prac. (Perkins' Ed.) p. 770, note 1. Demurrer to an answer i is unknown in equity pleading. Banks v. Manchester, 128 U. S. 250, 9 Sup. Ct. 36, 32 L. Ed. 425; Grether v. Wright, 23 C. C. A. 500, 75 Fed. 742. Nor can exceptions serve the office of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Banks v. ManchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Grether v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  3. Walker v. JackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  4. Stafford v. Brown & BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  5. McCormick v. ChamberlinNew York Court of Chancery · 1845

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cloutier v. DevereauxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Smythe v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Gorham Mfg. Co. v. WeintraubU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
  4. United States v. KettenbachDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API