Legal Opinion

United States v. Kettenbach

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided November 30, 1909Published

Action by the United States against William F. Kettenbach and others. On exceptions to the bill for impertinency.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

This suit was commenced by the United States to cancel several patents to lands the title to which was acquired under the provisions of the timber and stone act (Act June 3, 1878, c. 151, 20 Stat. 89 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1545]). The theory of the complainant is that the defendants entered into a conspiracy for the wrongful acquisition of these lands, the scheme being to induce various qualified persons to make entries ostensibly for themselves, but in reality upon behalf of the defendants and for their use. It is charged that in their initial applications the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. BiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Barrett v. Twin City Power Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API