Legal Opinion
Sanz v. Isbrandtsen Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
From March 16 to May 29,1945, plaintiff was chief cook on the S.S. Hannis Taylor, a United States Government owned vessel, the business of which was being managed and controlled by defendant under a general agency agreement of the kind involved in Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines (328 U. S. 707).
Plaintiff claims that about six o’clock in the morning of April 5 or 13, 1945, while the ship was at sea, he went to the icebox to get food for the day’s meals, that the floor, or deck, in front of the icebox, was covered with about two inches of dirty and greasy water, that to keep his feet from getting…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ahmed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc. Appeal of Ohio Barge Line, Inc. Appeal of Potter Title & Trust CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc. Appeal of Ohio Barge Line, Inc. Appeal of Potter Title & Trust CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950