Potter Title & Trust Co. v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc. Appeal of Ohio Barge Line, Inc. Appeal of Potter Title & Trust Co
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
Five judges sat in the court in banc at the reargument of this case. Three of them, Judges MARIS, O’CONNELL and KALODNER, were of the view that the district court erred in not entering judgment for the defendant and they voted in conference to reverse the judgment which the district court entered for the plaintiff. Their views are set out in the opinion which Judge O’CONNELL had prepared before his death and which the court now orders to be filed. Chief Judge BIGGS and Judge McLAUGHLIN were of the view that the judgment which the district court entered for the plaintiff was right and they…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lindquist v. DilkesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Tawada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- The KenilworthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
- Willey v. ALASKA PACKERS'ASS'N.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mroz v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Gonzales v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Pierro v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- McGuigan v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.