Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Argonaut Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 29, 2007No. 06-3395PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (“Underwriters”) entered into a reinsurance contract with Argonaut Insurance Company (“Argonaut”). A dispute over coverage arose, and Argonaut demanded arbitration in accordance with the contract. Further disputes arose related to the arbitration, and Underwriters filed a petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. It sought an order confirming a panel of arbitrators. After preliminary proceedings, the parties filed cross-motions…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pettiford v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Casa Del Caffe Vergnano S.P.A. v. Italflavors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Balkrishna Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Alghanim v. AlghanimDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Commissions Import Export S.A. v. Republic of the CongoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.