Legal Opinion

In re Harwood

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 27, 2013No. 12-110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Petitioner Catherine Harwood appeals a Human Services Board decision applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel to uphold the substantiation of her abuse of a vulnerable adult and thereby placing her name on the adult abuse registry. Petitioner argues that she should not be precluded from appealing the abuse substantiation because she was never given a full and fair opportunity to challenge the allegations. We agree, and reverse and remand.

¶ 2. The relevant facts are undisputed. Petitioner is the mother of M.T., a thirty-five-year-old woman who has significant developmental…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. In Re Central Vermont Public Service CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  3. In the Matter of Lawrence Lee Peterson, Bankrupt-Appellee v. Clark Leasing Corporation, Trustee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. PollanderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. In re P.J.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Appeal of H.H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  2. Stewart v. Virgin Islands Board of Land Use AppealsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. In re Appeal of M.V.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  4. In re HarwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API