Legal Opinion

Hobart Hoskins v. Mayor of Akron, Ohio, et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 14, 2025No. 5:25-cv-01987Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HOBART HOSKINS, ) CASE NO. 5:25-cv-1987 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CHIEF JUDGE SARA LIOI ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER vs. ) ) ) MAYOR OF AKRON, OHIO, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) Pro se plaintiff Hobart Hoskins (“Hoskins”) filed this in forma pauperis action against the “Mayor of Akron, Ohio,” “Chief of Akron, OH Police,” and two unnamed “et al.” defendants (collectively, “defendants”). (Doc. No. 1 (Complaint).) Hoskins brings this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging violations of the Seventh, Fourteenth, and Seventeenth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hill v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API