Legal Opinion

Mystic Steamship Corp. v. M/S Antonio Ferraz

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 5, 1974No. Nos. 765, 852, Dockets 73-2350, 74-1145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

These are appeals and cross appeals by the owners of the tug Betty Moran and the M/S Antonio Ferraz (“Ferraz”) from an interlocutory decree (settling all issues save for the question of damages) of the district court holding both responsible for a collision between the Ferraz and the barge Eastern No. 2, owned by Mystic Steamship Corp. The collision occurred in the early morning of June 11, 1968, off Cape Henry, Virginia, at the entrance to Chesapeake Bay. The place of collision was outside the area where the Navigation Rules for Inland Waters, 33 U.S.C. §§ 151-232,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. The Schooner Catharine v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Gulf Oil Corporation v. the Socony No. 16Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  5. New York & Liverpool United States Mail Steamship Co. v. RumballSupreme Court of the United States · 1859

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interstate Towing Co. v. StissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. United Overseas Export Lines, Inc. v. Medluck Compania Maviera, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Interstate Towing Co. v. StissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. United Overseas Export Lines, Inc. v. Medluck Compania MavieraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Spentonbush/Red Star Companies v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API