Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Conoco, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided October 6, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 82-187-APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge.

In this diversity action, plaintiffs seek partial cancellation of an oil, gas and mineral lease, and also seek damages from defendants for failing to protect the leased premises from drainage. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After some false starts, both sides have submitted briefs to the court, and the court finds that no oral argument is required.

The following facts are undisputed:

1) On May 31, 1976, W.C. Morrison, Inc. granted an oil, gas and mineral lease to Walter H. White, III,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hunter Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  2. Carter v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  3. Saunders v. Busch-Everett Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. Wier v. GrubbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers' Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rougon v. Chevron, U.S.A. Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1983
  2. Questar Exploration & Production Co. v. Woodard Villa, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API