Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robinson Township v. Knoll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1981No. 58747, (Calendar No. 1)Published

1Dissent

Blair Moody, Jr., J.

(dissenting).

Facts

This case, tried upon a stipulation of facts, involves the question of whether defendants should be enjoined from using their property in violation of a local zoning ordinance. Subsequent to the effective date of zoning ordinance amendments,1 defendants placed a 14-foot by 70-foot mobile home2 *334on their property located within the township. The amended ordinance provides that mobile homes are a permitted use only in approved mobile-home parks or mobile-home subdivisions.3 Defendants stipulated that their land had not been approved for use as a mobile-home…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Duckworth v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gust v. Township of CantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API