Legal Opinion

Virk v. Mississippi Department of Revenue

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2014No. 2013-CA-00073-SCTPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMAR, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Karmjit Virk appealed an increase in his tax liability to the Mississippi Department of Revenue’s Board of Review. When Virk failed to appear at his Board of Review hearing, his appeal was involuntarily withdrawn. Virk’s appeals to the Board of Tax Appeals and the Hinds County Chancery Court both were dismissed. Finding no error, we affirm the decisions of the Board of Review, the Board of Tax Appeals, and the Hinds County Chancery Court.

*811FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. The Mississippi Department of Revenue (MDOR) “is the primary agency for collecting tax…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. CrankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Buffington v. Mississippi State Tax CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Khurana v. Mississippi Department of RevenueMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Vincent v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ceola James v. Latrice WestbrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Kennedy v. Mississippi Department of RevenueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
  3. L Harris Construction Co. v. Mississippi Department of Revenue (In re L Harris Construction Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2015
  4. ENSCOR, LLC v. Ed MorganCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  5. Kevin McKeown v. Elizabeth Allison EstesCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API