Legal Opinion

F. S. Fuller & Co. v. Morrison

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 7, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

Where an action in contract is brought against more than one defendant, the plaintiff may have judgment against such defendants as are found liable, notwithstanding it is found that all the defendants are not jointly liable. G-. L. 1829. But separate and distinct judgments cannot be rendered in a joint action. Conti v. Johnson, 91 Vt. 467, 472, 100 Atl. 874; Metropolitan Washing Machine Co. v. Morris, 39 Vt. 393, 399. Where it is claimed that the defendants are all liable, but for different amounts, the plaintiff must elect or the court order which of them shall be discharged. Powers v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Trust Co. v. BrewsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Conn Boston Co. v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Watson v. PayneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  4. Miner's v. ShanasySupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  5. Washburn v. New York & Vermont Mining Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. Glass v. Newport Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Smith v. White EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  4. In Re Estate of RushfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API