Ritgert v. City of Rehoboth Beach
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case compels the Court to resolve the- pressing metaphysical question of when is a bench not just a bench but also a piece of equipment. Helen and John Rit-gert (the “Ritgerts”) brought suit against the City of Rehoboth Beach (“Rehoboth”) to recover damages for injuries caused by a bench which struck Mrs. Ritgert’s leg. In lieu of answering the Ritgerts’ complaint, Rehoboth filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fiat Motors of North America, Inc. v. Mayor of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Varity Builders, Inc. v. PolikoffSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Porter v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sadler v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Triple C Railcar Service, Inc. v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993