Legal Opinion

Ritgert v. City of Rehoboth Beach

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 9, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-448-JLLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case compels the Court to resolve the- pressing metaphysical question of when is a bench not just a bench but also a piece of equipment. Helen and John Rit-gert (the “Ritgerts”) brought suit against the City of Rehoboth Beach (“Rehoboth”) to recover damages for injuries caused by a bench which struck Mrs. Ritgert’s leg. In lieu of answering the Ritgerts’ complaint, Rehoboth filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc. v. Mayor of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. Varity Builders, Inc. v. PolikoffSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Porter v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sadler v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Triple C Railcar Service, Inc. v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API