Keplinger v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
Enumerations of error 1 and 2 contend that the “verdict and judgment was so grossly inadequate as to be contrary to law.” The appellant argues there was uncontradicted evidence that the plaintiff had special damages in the amount of $260' which was in excess of the verdict of $170. Of the $260 in special damages alleged, $160 consisted of two weeks loss in wages. The plaintiff testified that after the collision took place he lost two weeks from work where he was earning $80 per week. However, he failed to testify that the injury received in the collision was the reason he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Southern Bank v. GoetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Martin v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Pilgreen v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Fountain v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Douglas v. RinkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Herr v. WithersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Beal v. BrauneckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Beal v. BrauneckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Claxton v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.