Legal Opinion

Southern Bank v. Goette

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 22, 1899PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Gamble. Emanuel superior court. November 29, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

1. Relatively to the revising powers of this court, the jury are the exclusive judges of the credibility of witnesses. Rome Railroad Co.v. Barnett, 94 Ga. 446. Therefore this court will not reverse a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was contrary to evidence, when the presiding judge in the exercise of his discretion has allowed the verdict to stand, and the same is supported by the evidence of any of the witnesses sworn on the trial, notwithstanding much of the evidence tended to impeach the credibility of such witnesses.

2. This rule is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Rome Railroad v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Wilson v. BlairMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Davis v. AkridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Atlanta Railway & Power Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Lampkin v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API