Legal Opinion

CASTILLO CHAIDEZ v. HEMPHILL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01837Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE ENRIQUE CASTILLO CHAIDEZ, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION v. : No. 18-1837 : CARL HEMPHILL, ET AL. : Defendants. : McHUGH, J. NOVEMBER 15, 2019 MEMORANDUM This is a case rooted in allegations of labor trafficking where the issue presently before the Court is whether a release between the parties bars the Plaintiff’s claims, or is unenforceable on grounds of unconscionability. Plaintiff Jose Enrique Castillo Chaidez, a Mexican national, has sued under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA),

18 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Charles Harris v. Green Tree Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API