Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1994No. 93-1897PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

We adopt in large measure the posture of amicus curiae Attorney General. Amicus advances three positions: (1) the court of appeals did not have original jurisdiction to grant a motion for a new trial; (2) a criminal defendant must suffer the consequences of nonproduction of an appellate record where such nonproduction is caused by his own actions; and (3) the trial court should hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Jones is substantially responsible for the absence of a record in this case.

I

Section 3(B)(1), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution provides appellate courts with limited…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Friedman v. RehalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. VerikokidesUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. HuntOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. In re Affidavit of Helms (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API