Legal Opinion

Kirk v. North Little Rock Special School District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). Counsel for appellant claims that he only desires the court to pass upon the question of whether or not the defendant special school district could issue bonds in payment of the current expenses of the schools of the district. To pass upon the question insisted upon by appellant could not possibly result in any benefit to him. It is fairly infer-able from his own complaint that the bonds had been issued and sold to the Bankers’ Trust Company, which is not made a party to the action, before the present suit was brought. The affidavit of the secretary of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Jones v. MontagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Wilson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Kays v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Four States Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Donley v. DonleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Frisby v. Strong School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Winn v. BondsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Vairo v. VairoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API