Legal Opinion

Carll v. Interstate Consolidated R.R. Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 12, 1902PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Trespass on the Case for negligence, on facts stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

This is trespass on the case for negligence, and is before us on the defendant’s demurrer to the declaration.

The declaration alleges that on the 15th day of February, 1899, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant to aid in removing. ice and snow which had accumulated in large quantities upon its tracks and road-bed; that he was taken and conveyed in one of the cars of the defendant corporation from the car-barn in Pawtucket to Attleboro, Mass., where he was set at work in removing said snow and ice, and that he was kept at said, work for an unreasonable length of time, to wit, for…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. CitiSteel USA, Inc. v. CONNELL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. Orenstein v. KahnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
  3. Hansen v. KuhnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Heitz v. SayersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
  5. Armsby v. Grays Harbor Commercial Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API