Legal Opinion
Esterly v. Rua
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1903No. 907PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
On the presentation of the appeal before this court, it is contended that the judgment should be reversed for the following reasons: (1) The claim presented to the administrator was not properly verified; (2) the heirs of the decedent were not made parties; (3) the claim presented to the District Court was different from that presented to the administrator; (4) the court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter; (5) the court erred in denying the appellant a jury trial.
The first three grounds on which the judgment is now attacked are not included in the assignments of error. The assignments…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perris v. HigleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Grape Creek Coal Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- Pearce v. CalhounSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Van Petten v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- State ex rel. Richardson v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bank of California National Ass'n v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Cartwright v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Piper v. CashellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Davis v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- In re Person's EstateDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.