Legal Opinion
Hollstein v. First Nat. Bank of Aurora
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1989No. 88-737PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This matter is submitted to us, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-219 (Reissue 1985), as a certified question of law from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Specifically, the question is:
Whether the Nebraska statutes governing sanitary and improvement districts, Neb. Rev. Stat. [§§] 31-701 et seq. (Reissue 1984), grant a priority of payment in favor of bonds over warrants so as to require that bonds be fully paid prior to utilizing revenues for payment of warrants.
This question was precipitated by the filing by Sanitary and Improvement District No. 65 of Sarpy County, Nebraska,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Adkisson v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Matzke v. City of SewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Douglas v. HerringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- McGowen v. Nebraska State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanitary & Improvement District No. 272 v. MarquardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- SID No. 1 v. AdamyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Matter of Sanitary & Imp. Dist., No. 7United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1989
- SID No. 67 v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
- Hollstein v. First National Bank of Aurora (In re Sanitary & Improvement District 65 of Sarpy County, Nebraska)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.