Legal Opinion

Hollstein v. First National Bank of Aurora (In re Sanitary & Improvement District 65 of Sarpy County, Nebraska)

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1989No. 87-2616PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

At issue before the court is the interpretation of Nebraska law concerning the relative repayment rights the Nebraska legislature intended for bondholders and warrant-holders in situations where tax revenues are insufficient to fully satisfy both. Specifically, the issue concerns the claims of bondholders of a Sanitary and Improvement District (District) under the Nebraska statutes, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 31-701, et seq. (Reissue 1984), and whether they are superior to the claims of warrantholders of the District thereby requiring the debtor to treat the claims of bondholders with a priority over…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hollstein v. First Nat. Bank of AuroraNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanitary and Improvement District 65 of Sarpy County, Nebraska. v. First National Bank of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API