Legal Opinion

Crane Bros. Manufacturing v. Keck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1892PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Buffalo county. Heard below before Hamer, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

This is an action by material-men to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon á hotel in the city of Kearney.

*684On the trial of the cause the court below found that the whole value of the material furnished by the plaintiff was the sum of $643, and that the defendants had paid thereon the sum of $450, and that the defendant Keck had sustained damages by reason of the delay of the defendants in furnishing the material, in the sum of $193. The court thereupon found for the defendants and dismissed the action. The plaintiff appeals.

A motion is now made on behalf of Walther to quash the bill…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. TullisSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Bayne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Graham v. Van DuzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1876

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Columbia Digger Co. v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  2. Crane Co. v. Pacific Heat & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Alexander Lumber Co. v. Ætna Accident & Liability Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Salt Lake City v. O'ConnorUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Sioux City Foundry & Manufacturing Co. v. MertenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API