Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Rosenberg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1963No. 31106PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDDY, Presiding Judge.

This is an action to recover damages resulting from the alleged malpractice of defendant, a physician and surgeon. The jury returned a verdict for $9000. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was sustained on the ground that the trial court erred in giving plaintiff’s Instructions No. 1 and No. 4 and plaintiff appealed.

Defendant contends that plaintiff did not make a submissible case for the jury and, therefore, plaintiff’s claims of error are moot. This contention of defendant requires a full summation of the evidence. Before stating the evidence, we set out the pertinent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pedigo v. RoseberrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Williams v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. State ex rel. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. Dittmeier v. Missouri Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Aetna Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. Stahlheber v. American Cyanamid CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Van Zee v. Sioux Valley HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Fisher v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API