People v. Larke
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
A jury convicted defendant of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496) as charged in the third count of the information and acquitted him of grand theft and burglary as charged in the first and second counts.
Defendant makes only two contentions on appeal: (1) that his oral statements made to the police should not have been introduced in evidence because he was not represented by counsel at the time they were made and he had not been advised of his right to counsel; (2) that the trial court erred in advising the jury that it could consider the testimony respecting a cash register not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. GiovianniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.