People v. Palmer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
The defendant, Sammie Palmer, appeals from a conviction of first degree robbery. He and Hanford Glenn, his codefendant, were two of a group of four men who robbed Kenneth McKinzie, a gasoline station proprietor, in the City of Modesto. While the defendant urged a series of defenses to the effect that he was a completely, or at least a relatively, innocent bystander, his counsel is too cognizant of appellate court technique to claim that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant the conviction; in other words, it is inferentially conceded that there is substantial evidence which, if…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.