Legal Opinion

People v. Palmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1965No. Crim. 166PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

The defendant, Sammie Palmer, appeals from a conviction of first degree robbery. He and Hanford Glenn, his codefendant, were two of a group of four men who robbed Kenneth McKinzie, a gasoline station proprietor, in the City of Modesto. While the defendant urged a series of defenses to the effect that he was a completely, or at least a relatively, innocent bystander, his counsel is too cognizant of appellate court technique to claim that there is not sufficient evidence to warrant the conviction; in other words, it is inferentially conceded that there is substantial evidence which, if…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API