Legal Opinion

State v. Foley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 15, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WERNICK, Justice.

Charged with having operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-A), defendant John E. Foley was on trial before a jury when, on July 17, 1975, the presiding Justice declared a mistrial. Then, on July 30, all parties agreeing and having stipulated the facts, the presiding Justice ordered the case reported (Rule 37A M.R. Crim.P.) for this Court’s decision of issues pertaining to Maine’s so-called “implied consent” law (29 M.R.S.A. § 1312).

The facts are these.

After arresting defendant for operating a motor vehicle while under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hand v. NickersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  2. Huot v. GendronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  3. State v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. State v. ColburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  5. Blackwell v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PlaczekSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Tierney v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. BassfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Matheson v. Bangor Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. State v. DoucetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API