Legal Opinion · Dissent

Asbury Park Board of Education v. New Jersey Department of Education

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 27, 2004Published

1Dissent

COBURN, J.A.D.,

dissenting.

Speaking for the Court in Abbott v. Burke, 170 N.J. 537, 790 A.2d 842 (2002), Chief Justice Poritz observed that “[t]imely disposition of Abbott cases is critical for children living in the Abbott districts.” Id. at 543, 790 A.2d at 846. She added that “[d]ecision-making in respect of programs for the next school year must be completed in time for implementation in the next school year if the process is to be meaningful.” Ibid. She concluded by characterizing the Department of Education’s record on “timely disposition” of Abbott budgeting decisions as “dismal.” Ibid.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Abbott Ex Rel. Abbott v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Abbott v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Asbury Park Bd. of Educ. v. NJ DOENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API