Legal Opinion

Lindsay Nelson and David Nelson v. Chongqing Qiulong Technology Co., Ltd dba Surron; Sur-Ron U.S.A, LLC; Luna Cycles, LLC; Panasonic Corporation of North America dba Panasonic Industrial Devices Service Company of America; and Doe Entities 1-100

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided June 5, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00010Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO LINDSAY NELSON and DAVID NELSON, Case No. 2:25-cv-00010-BLW Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. CHONGQING QIULONG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD dba SURRON; SUR-RON U.S.A, LLC; LUNA CYCLES, LLC; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA dba PANASONIC INDUSTRIAL DEVICES SERVICE COMPANY OF AMERICA; and DOE ENTITIES 1-100, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are Defendant Chongqing Qiulong Technology Co., Ltd.’s (CQT) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. 25) and Plaintiff Lindsay and David Nelson’s Motion for Leave to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API