Legal Opinion

Norris v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1915No. Docket No. 123PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Casé by Myrtle I. Norris against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The plaintiff, an unmarried woman about 24 years of age, brought this action to recover damages resulting from her falling into an excavation made by the defendant in the course of the construction of its tracks in the city of Detroit. In June, 1911, the defendant was building a track on Grandy avenue north from Gratiot avenue, in said city. One block north of Mack avenue, Grandy crosses St. Joseph street at about right angles; the latter street running east and west. Grandy avenue at this time was a paved street; St. Joseph was not. There is a depression in Grandy avenue between Alexandrine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Comstock v. Township of GeorgetownMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Beattie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Marshall v. Wabash RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. O'Dea v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norris v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Holford v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Grogitzki v. Detroit Ambulance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Stinson v. PayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API