Legal Opinion
Elliott-Lewis Elec. Co. v. Hausman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 7, 1931No. Appeal 143PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldbige, J.,
This is an appeal from a judgment entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
The cause of action is based upon a contract of suretyship executed by the defendant on April 1,1920, wherein he agreed to become a surety for the Hausman Electric Company. The partners composing the firm were not mentioned therein, but it is admitted that they were Andrew H. Hausman and Clarence E. Hausman, two sons of the surety. “This agreement is to be a continuing one to cover any, and all salés, until further notice......that the agreement is revoked be given the Elliott-Lewis…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thommen v. Aldine Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Richardson v. . County of SteubenNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- White v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- W. E. Heyser Lumber Co. v. Whiting Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Horner v. HoukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whitfield v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- McElrath v. Wiley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1975
- Sork v. C. Trevor Dunham, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932