Legal Opinion

A. F. King & Son v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1963No. 39925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

It is the general duty of an employer to use ordinary care to furnish his employees with tools and ap pliances reasonably suited to the use for which they are intended, and to use like diligence in inspecting them and keeping them in proper condition; and if there are latent defects in said instrumentalities, unknown to the employee, of which the employer knows or ought to know, it is his duty to give his employee warning in respect thereto. Code § 66-301; Williams v. Garbutt Lmbr. Co., 132 Ga. 221 (64 SE 65). The employee, however, assumes the ordinary risks of his employment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Platt v. Southern Photo Material Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Cedartown Cotton & Export Co. v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Sinkovitz v. Peters Land Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. NelmsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. King v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Rothberg v. Charles H. Hardin Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Harrell v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Thurmond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API