Strickland v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
Freddie Lee Howard, a farm employee, brought this action against his employer, Paul Strickland, seeking recovery for an eye injury allegedly resulting from Strickland’s negligence. On the trial of the case, a jury found in favor of Howard, and Strickland appeals.
1. Strickland contends the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for directed verdict. “A directed verdict is proper only where there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced together with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom demands a particular verdict.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barksdale v. NuwarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Teague v. KeithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Robert & Co. Associates v. TignerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Tect Construction Co. v. FrymyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Jones v. AbelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Johnson v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Armenise v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Jones v. Krystal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Construction Lender, Inc. v. SutterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Goldsmith v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.