Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1990)

Missouri Attorney General Reports

Decided August 27, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Christopher Graham Representative, District 112 Post Office Box 746 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102

Dear Representative Graham:

This opinion is in response to your questions asking:

Do the motor vehicle dealer bonds required by Section 301.560, RSMo protect any aggrieved party suffering loss by the acts of the person bonded, when the grounds for the suspension or revocation of the license of the bonded person resulted from his activities occurring outside of Missouri?

Does "any aggrieved party" as cited in the statute include licensed motor vehicle dealers and/or automobile auctions?

S…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Metro Auto Auction v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Sandberg v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Swift & Co. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ore-Ida Potato Products, Inc. v. United Pacific InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Surety Co. v. LensingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API