Legal Opinion

Sandberg v. McDonald

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 23, 1918No. 392PublishedCited by 74 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion. It was the broad purpose of Congress to grant to the seaman personal liberty and to prohibit as to all vessels that came within our jurisdiction the evil of paying the seaman his wages in .advance and thereby to'promote the welfare of the American merchant marine and the American seaman by an equalization of wages.

Read the full summary

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion. It was the broad purpose of Congress to grant to the seaman personal liberty and to prohibit as to all vessels that came within our jurisdiction the evil of paying the seaman his wages in .advance and thereby to'promote the welfare of the American merchant marine and the American seaman by an equalization of wages. The language of the act is broad enough to cover such an advance, and even if this were not the case the payment of such ah advance ought not to be upheld by an American court, when…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This case brings before us for consideration certain features of the so-called “Seaman’s Act.” (38 Stvat. 1164.) The act is entitled: “An Act To promote the welfare of American seamen in the merchant marine of *191the United'States; to. abolish arrest and imprisonment as a penalty, for desertion and to secure the1 abrogation of treaty provisions in relation thereto; and to promote safety at sea.’! It contains numerous provisions inténded to secure better treatment of seamen, and to secure for them better conditions of service. •

The libel charges a demand in Mobile, Alabama, for one-half part of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Patterson v. Bark EudoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Strathearn Steamship Co. v. DillonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. In Re Managed Care LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
  5. Klaus Zoelsch v. Arthur Andersen & CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API