Legal Opinion

Bakhshandeh v. American Cyanamid Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.

A prior motion by the defendant for summary judgment was denied with the following opinion (Bakhshandeh v. American Cyanamid Co., 12 Misc 2d 651): “ The defendant’s motion addressed to the fourth and fifth causes of action rests upon the absence of a writing satisfying the requirements of section 33-c of the Personal Property Law. Conceivably such a writing may be in the defendant’s possession and control and might be adequate, although undelivered. (Transit Advertisers v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. Co., 194 F. 2d 907, 910.) An examination before trial is pending which plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Transit Advertisers, Inc. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Dube v. Cromwell Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Brandwein v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bakhshandeh v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API