Legal Opinion

Dube v. Cromwell Drug Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff has been granted summary judgment on a series of notes of which defendant-appellant is the maker, plaintiff’s nephew is the payee, and plaintiff the holder by his nephew’s indorsement. The answer pleads as defenses failure of consideration for the notes and that the issuance of the notes was ultra vires, all to plaintiff’s knowledge, so that he was not a purchaser in good faith.. It appears from the moving and answering affidavits that underlying the issuance and indorsement of the notes was a business association between defendant corporation and plaintiff’s nephew financed by…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. New York Movers Tariff Bureau, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Schwartz v. Mastercraft Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Bakhshandeh v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Dube v. Cromwell Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Bakhshandeh v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API