Legal Opinion

Spreng v. Flaherty

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1931No. 234PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

Tinder this state of the evidence we are asked to say as a matter of law that the plaintiff was guilty of such contributory negligence as would bar a recovery. The distance at which the plaintiff and his friends saw the rollers is variously estimated, and was at best only a.matter of estimate. The ability to stop a 'car quickly depends upon a variety of circumstances, some of which are the nature of thé roadway and its condition as to being slippery or otherwise, and the record contains evidence that this roadway was wet and more or less slippery.

Certainly a court can not take judicial notice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mostov v. UnkeferOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Doran v. BethardsOhio Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Womochil v. List & Clark Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. McCoy v. GilbertOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Alexander v. New York Central RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. McCoy v. GilbertOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API