Legal Opinion

Womochil v. List & Clark Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1932No. 30,640PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action for damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff and caused by the alleged negligence of defendant *696through its failure to put up sufficient warning lights and signs to apprise motorists of an excavation it had made on the public highway.

On the afternoon of April 8, 1931, defendant made an excavation on highway No. 15 in Dickinson county for the purpose of constructing a culvert. The excavation extended the full width of the north- and-south road, and was four to six feet deep and seven or eight feet wide. That evening…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Schubach v. HammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Hayden v. Jack Cooper Transport Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Stanger v. HunterIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Topeka Water Co. v. WhitingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grisamore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Goodman v. WisbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Towell v. StaleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Drennan v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Winfough v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API