Legal Opinion
Bluth v. Bluth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 27, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), entered October 27, 2006, as, after a nonjury trial, granted the plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In order to obtain a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, the plaintiff must prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the defendant’s conduct “so endan*797gers the physical or mental well…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hessen v. HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Brady v. BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bulger v. BulgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Dunne v. DunneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Biegeleisen v. BiegeleisenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benabu v. RienzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Luongo v. LuongoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Kelly v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Benabu v. RienzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013