Legal Opinion

Amadeu Santos v. State of Rhode Island

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 2, 2014No. 2013-131-AppealPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice SUTTELL, for the Court.

The applicant, Amadeu Santos, appeals from the denial of his application for post-conviction relief. Santos contends that the hearing justice erred in finding that his application was barred by the doctrine of laches. This case came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After considering the parties’ written and oral submissions and reviewing the record, we conclude that cause has not been shown and that this case may be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kennedy v. Providence Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. Chapdelaine v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. O'REILLY v. Town of GlocesterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  5. Raso v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gary Tassone v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2026
  2. Miguel Tebalan Rivera v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2024
  3. Tempest v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API