Legal Opinion

Schuehle v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1939No. 27367. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

On December 20,1935, Martin Schuehle

entered into a written contract with the city of Seattle, under the terms of which he was obligated to construct, according to certain plans and specifications, a reinforced concrete bridge, known as Schmitz park bridge, on Admiral way. Two hundred and seventy days were specified as the time for the completion of the work after notice to begin, which was given February 3, 1936, and completion was certified January 15, 1937. The two hundred and seventy days expired November 1, 1936, and an extension of time of forty-five days was then granted.

The contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kieburtz v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Atwood v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. McHugh v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hensler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. V. C. Edwards Contracting Co. v. Port of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API