Legal Opinion

Flock v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 19, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by'

Yaw Syckel, J.

The only question involved in this case is whether the act of March 30th, 1886, commonly called the “Martin act,” is constitutional. Pamph. L., p. 14-9; Gen. Stat., p. 3370.

This question is elaborately discussed’ in the opinion of the Supreme Court (In re Commissioners of Elizabeth, 20 Vroom 488) sustaining the validity of this legislation. "We fully concur in the view expressed by the Supreme Court, and deem it necessary only to notice briefly some objections not specifically discussed in that opinion.

1. The insistment is that the act…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Essex Public Road Board v. SkinkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Loíza Sugar Co. v. BuscagliaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
  3. McDonald v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  4. Loíza Sugar Co. v. BuscagliaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
  5. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API