Legal Opinion
Moses v. Dautartas
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided May 15, 1996No. CA 95-366Published
1Opinion of the Court
922 S.W.2d 345 (1996)
53 Ark.App. 242
Dayton MOSES, et ux., Appellants,
v.
Ella DAUTARTAS, Appellee.
No. CA 95-366.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas.
May 15, 1996.
Dan McCraw, Hot Springs, for appellants.
D. Scott Hickman, Hot Springs, for appellee.
EN BANC
PITTMAN, Judge.
The appellants, Dayton and Betty Moses, appeal from a chancery court order holding that the appellee, Ella Dautartas, proved adverse possession of land to which appellants hold legal title. We affirm.
The parties to this appeal own adjoining property in the Quinn's Lake Park Subdivision in Garland County. Appellee filed a complaint in May…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thomas v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Security Pacific Housing Services, Inc. v. FriddleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Moses v. DautartasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Hicks v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Walker v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.