Legal Opinion

Parks v. Saint Lawrence Life Ass'n

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 16, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrince, J.

The plaintiff brings this action for $200 under a policy of insurance issued upon the application of his alleged wife, the decedent, who named the plaintiff as the beneficiary and stated *436in said application that the relationship of plaintiff to her was that of husband. Although the decedent was living with plaintiff at the time she applied for the policy, she had previously been legally married to another man, from whom she had never been divorced, and plaintiff had previously been legally married to another Woman, from whom he had never been divorced. Neither plaintiff nor decedent knew of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaines v. . Fidelity Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Archer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Moore v. Prudential Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ticconi v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Ticconi v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API